VI Conferencia Internacional de Mecánica del Suelo e Ingeniería de Fundaciones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La VI Conferencia Internacional de Mecánica del Suelo e Ingeniería de Fundaciones se desarrolló en sesiones plenarias de mañana y tarde en el Place des Arts (Palacio de Artes), en la ciudad de Montreal, Canadá, entre el 8 y el 15 de Septiembre del presente año. Las anteriores Conferencias se efectuaron, en Cambridge, Mass, la primera en 1936; luego en 1948, en Rotterdam la segunda; la tercera se realizó en Zúrich, en 1953; Londres fue la sede de la cuarta Conferencia, en 1957; en 1961 se realizó la quinta Conferencia en la ciudad de París. A esta Conferencia de Montreal, asistieron alrededor de 1.200 delegados de 46 naciones de todo el mundo y se presentaron 218 trabajos técnicos. (Texto tomado de la fuente)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it