THE TYPE COLLECTION OF THE W. P. FRASER HERBARIUM (SASK) OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(SASK) de la Universidad de Saskatchewan se encuentra entre los 15 principales herbarios de Canadá. A la fecha, la colección del herbario contiene aproximadamente 164 000 ejemplares, incluyendo líquenes, plantas no vasculares y plantas vasculares. Uno de los objetivos principales de esta institución está enfocado al desarrollo de las colecciones botánicas, inventarios florísticos, así como estudios de biodiversidad y taxonómico-sistemáticos con énfasis en la flora nativa de la provincia de Saskatchewan. En este artículo proporcionamos una lista detallada de los ejemplares tipo con el objeto de difundir el importante acervo botánico a la comunidad latinoamericana. Nuestra lista incluye nombres científicos, autoridades taxonómicas, así como las citas biblio-gráficas originales en las cuales se publicaron los nombres científicos, mismos que se encuentran en la biblioteca de SASK. Las imágenes digitales de los ejemplares tipo se encuentran disponibles en el herbario y en:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.172 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".