MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034454704

The use of artificial intelligence to identify thought messages via non-invasive EEG brain signals

2024· other· en· W7034454704 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsBespokeElectroencephalographyFeature extractionBrain–computer interfaceSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial neural networkSignal processingReliability (semiconductor)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) have opened up opportunities by advancing the technology, offering new possibilities in both practical applications and theoretical research. Individuals with Completely Locked-in Syndrome, which can result from conditions such as Motor Neurone Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, stand to gain significantly from BCIs developments aimed at enhancing communication and overall well-being. This PhD research focuses on developing a system to recognise imagined thoughts through Electroencephalography (EEG) brain signals and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with the goal of implementing a novel methodology to establish a direct communication link between brain functionality and computer interfaces. Developing effective systems for transforming EEG signals into practical communication outputs for various mental tasks presents significant challenges in the field of signal processing. A novel approach, termed Automated Sensory and Signal Processing System (ASPS), is introduced for feature extraction and selection in EEG signal data. This method enhances the reliability of EEG-based communication by identifying and selecting the most relevant features for classification. The ASPS approach is initially implemented with an elementary model and tested through bespoke analysis. The study is subsequently scaled up by increasing the number of subjects, forming groups, and incorporating various domains analysis in signal processing and statistical functions. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are employed for classification, simultaneously verifying the performance of the ASPS approach. The extracted features, generated as outputs of the ASPS approach, serve as inputs to the ANN. High-quality features that are consistent and distinguishable for each mental task facilitate high accuracy in brain signal classification, demonstrating the effectiveness of the feature extraction technique. In this study, feature extraction is significantly enhanced by the ASPS approach, leading to more accurate mental imagery recognition. These extracted features are classified using ANN algorithms, specifically Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN) and Learning Vector Quantisation, demonstrating high accuracy across bespoke, group-based, and combined analyses. Six different ANN architectures with various combination of neurons and hidden layers are employed. Additionally, Convolutional Neural Network, a widely used image processing technique, is utilised in another experiment to classify signals, demonstrating the capability to recognise imagined thoughts. Based on these architectures, different ANN and CNN models are trained and tested to identify the most optimised classifier for imagination recognition. The performance of these classifiers is summarised and compared to evaluate the robustness of the classification algorithms. Overall, the single-layered FFNN ensures very consistent and high accuracy in imagination recognition. Furthermore, EEG sensor optimisation is explored through extensive analysis, followed by a thorough validation of the optimised sensors. These optimised sensors simplify signal processing and enhance the accuracy of imagination recognition. Finally, an experiment with a novel product, the EEG-BCI prototype, introduces an optimised sensor-based interface that enables EEG recording from the scalp and the identification of two distinct thoughts according to the proposed methodology. The system's upward-trending performance indicates potential for future enhancements, paving the way for an affordable and accessible solution that empowers individuals with disabilities to interact with their surroundings and improve their overall well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207