MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W70345358

[Temporal epilepsy: clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects].

2013· article· en· W70345358 on OpenAlexaff
José Francisco Téllez‐Zenteno, Lady Diana Ladino

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsySemiologyTemporal lobeEpilepsy surgeryMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicinePediatricsPsychiatryPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is a common neurological disease with significant public health impact. Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is one of the most frequent and complex epilepsies. AIM: To review the most important aspects of clinical diagnosis, the use of diagnostic tests, and medical and surgical treatment of TLE. DEVELOPMENT: TLE is a well described type of epilepsy. Approximately 40% of patients with TLE develop drug resistant epilepsy. Nowadays, new diagnosis tools have been added for the assessment of patients with TLE that could be candidates for epilepsy surgery. However semiology remains the starting point for the disease understanding and every localizing and lateralizing sign is relevant to understand the potential onset and dissemination of seizures. The combination of tests and semiology is important to decide which cases require intracranial electrodes. The prognosis of epilepsy surgery in TLE is very good and between 60 to 70% of patients rendered seizure free after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to patients with TLE is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team of trained specialists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→