MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034548522

Using participatory arts-based research to explore the experiences of cannabis consumption among women from marginalized social positions in downtown Hamilton

2024· dissertation· en· W7034548522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilk-based biomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticipatory action researchCitizen journalismIdentity (music)Photo elicitationCannabisNarrativeConsumption (sociology)DowntownPower (physics)Action (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research explores the subjective experiences and perspectives of women who occupy marginalized positions in Canadian society who consume cannabis. While cannabis use has been normalized among certain populations since legalization, it remains unclear how this new terrain will impact women's experiences of access, consumption, and disclosure, especially those experiencing marginalization along various axes of identity such as gender, race, and class. The women participated in the art-making process of creating their own personalized body map, a life- sized image of one’s body that includes shapes, images, colours, and symbols to visually represent their life story. Accompanying and complimenting the artwork, were the women’s narratives that reflected their lives, relationships, and experiences related to cannabis consumption, offering a nuanced and complex understanding of their experiences. An intersectional feminist lens foregrounds the research, drawing on the principles of Feminist Participatory Action Research (FPAR), to examine the experiences of women who consume cannabis, the ways in which their cannabis use may be perceived and understood by health and social care providers and systems, and whether they will benefit from legalization in the same way as those with more privileged identities. The theoretical and methodological choices are intended to emphasize how social positionings impact and differentiate women’s’ experiences while also considering how particular identities are influenced by structural forces, unequal social relationships, and power imbalances. Moreover, this research study seeks to centre the lived experiences and voices of women, while analyzing the complex, multi-dimensional, and overlapping factors that impact women’s decision-making processes, motives, and experiences with cannabis use. The research is essential to create new knowledge that can inform social work and allied professional policies and practices to serving women, and shift the current discourse surrounding women’s cannabis use, thereby reducing stigmatizing practices and policies in health and social related fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207