MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034571195

Trauma & Entrepreneurship: Challenges and Opportunities Across Three Contexts

2025· dissertation· en· W7034571195 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrthoptera Research and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipTransformative learningAutonomySocial entrepreneurshipRefugeeSocial capitalLeverage (statistics)Critical consciousnessBridging (networking)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trauma, whether experienced individually or collectively, can profoundly influence entrepreneurial motivation, behavior, and well-being. Through three interrelated papers, this dissertation examines how trauma can simultaneously constrain and catalyze entrepreneurial action. The first paper investigates how a large public research university responded to the cascading collective traumas of the COVID-19 pandemic by embracing intrapreneurial thinking. By launching a virtual incubator to support marginalized entrepreneurs worldwide, the institution not only addressed societal needs but also bolstered its adaptability, legitimacy, and social impact. The second paper introduces a trauma-informed framework for refugee entrepreneurship support, grounded in principles of trauma-informed care to address traumas often experienced by refugees. By centering psychological well-being and trauma-informed interventions, this framework offers practical guidance for tailoring entrepreneurship programs to the unique needs of refugee entrepreneurs. The third paper employs Freire’s critical consciousness theory to explore the entrepreneurial endeavors of bar hostesses (i.e., sex workers) in Nairobi, Kenya. We observe that despite confronting overlapping traumas – stigmatization, COVID-19 disruptions, and systemic marginalization – they exercise entrepreneurial autonomy and collective emancipation. Their experiences underscore how dialogue, critical reflection and action, and empowering entrepreneurship education can spur resilience, community-building, and social change. Taken together, these three studies highlight trauma’s dual capacity to hinder and inspire innovation and social impact. By illuminating social intrapreneurship, trauma-informed care, and critical consciousness, this dissertation provides new insights into how individuals and communities facing profound adversity and trauma can leverage entrepreneurship for transformative healing, empowerment, and inclusive economic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.032
Scholarly communication0.0160.013
Open science0.0010.022
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicOrthoptera Research and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207