Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dit boek analyseert de instellingen en effecten van elf moderne welvaartsstaten (VS, VK, Canada, Australië, Duitsland, Frankrijk, België, Nederland, Zweden, Denemarken en Noorwegen). Aan de hand van kwantitatieve gegevens laten de auteurs eerst zien dat de institutionele verscheidenheid tussen deze landen kan worden teruggebracht tot drie hoofdtypen. Vervolgens onderzoeken ze de impact van deze drie 'werelden van welvaart': de effecten op inkomensherverdeling, ongelijkheid, armoede en sociale zekerheid. De studie maakt duidelijk dat instituties ertoe doen, maar ook dat de verdelingsresultaten van verzorgingsstaattypes niet zo eenvoudig zijn als je zou verwachten. Het biedt vooral een empirische basis voor het beleidsdebat over de sterke en zwakke punten van verzorgingsstaten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".