MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034642102

US Army order of battle, 1919-1941 : volume 1.

2010· other· en· W7034642102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIke Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library (US Army Combined Arms Center) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWonderSuspectOrder (exchange)OfficerWorld War IIWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)First world war
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When thumbing through this work, I suspect many people would wonder what prompted somebody to put together a reference work that details the history of the US Army in peacetime, especially during a period that seems relatively uneventful. To explain, I have to go back a ways. This work is the result of over 19 years of research and writing that attempts to document adequately the organizations, commanders, and activities of the US Army from 1919 to 1941 in what is commonly known as "the interwar years." The genesis of this project was my entry into the world of military insignia collecting when I was a teenager in 1972. At that time, I had little interest in the Army. In my mind, I was headed for Annapolis and a naval career. I joined the Army Junior Reserve Officers' Training Course (ROTC) program at Baker High School in Columbus, Georgia, and there met Tom Stafford. At Tom's house, I encountered a distinctive unit insignia (commonly referred to as "crests") collection that his father, a retired sergeant major, had assembled over many years. I was fascinated by Sergeant Major Stafford's collection. Upon inquiry, however, Tom's father did not seem to know much about the history of the pre-World War II units in his "crest" collection that, for some reason, were the kinds of insignia to which I was particularly drawn. I started my own collection and wanted to know everything I could about those units. As I collected by attending militaria shows and traded insignia with many former soldiers of the World War II and Korean War eras, I discovered that, other than Regular Army units, the collectors did not seem to know much about most of the older National Guard and Organized Reserve units either. I started digging for information at the Infantry School library at Fort Benning, Georgia. I found some information on National Guard units, but could find almost nothing about the Organized Reserve. Those units seemed to have been lost to Army history. It was almost as if the units and their officers and men hardly even existed. The conundrum was also keen for the four, virtually unknown, cavalry divisions in the National Guard during that period. I read everything I could find about these Reserve Component units, but everywhere I looked, I seemed to come up with very little. In 1990, while attending the Inspector General's course at Fort Belvoir, VA, I decided to go to the National Archives in Suitland, MD, to see what I could find on these old outfits. There I discovered a treasure trove of documents in Record Group 394 that laid out much of the organization and activities of the interwar Army. I also discovered that here was an Army that was indeed genuine, composed of real people and units and not merely the "paper army" that I had come to believe was the Organized Reserve. I also learned that the Army was busier with training, maneuvers, and emergency duties than I imagined. The Regular Army was involved in a wide variety of duties that included activities as diverse as martial law duty in labor strikes to engineer surveys of the Nicaragua Canal project and deployments to Shanghai, China. I found that the National Guard was intended to be a much larger organization than what actually existed during this period; each state was allotted many more units than they could actually organize due to lack of funding by Congress and the sagging interest in military service after World War I. I discovered that members of the third component, the Organized Reserve, were an amazing collection of men who willingly participated in monthly training meetings without pay or retirement benefits. Unlike the National Guardsmen who were also paid for drills, these men were paid only for their attendance at the annual 2-week summer training camp. Yet, year after year, the Organized Reserve continued to grow, and it was this group of soldiers, especially the officers, who made possible the creation of the huge US Army of World War II. All of these men served at a time when the military, and especially the Army, was given short shrift by the Nation. Yet the men and the units to which they belonged continued to soldier on, almost forgotten yet still proud to do the job that so many others deigned to do. Here was a story that needed to be told, and I decided at that point that I would do it. In completing this work, it is my hope that this information will be found useful by command historians, especially unit historians, for all three components of the US Army, in helping them to tell the story of these organizations. Many of the units whose histories are contained herein still exist today, and it is important to make this kind of information available, especially now due to the reorganization of the Army to the modular tables of organization. To break with these long and storied histories is like throwing away a combat multiplier. The Army has already done that to some degree with units at the division level and above. Not one division, corps, or army, for example, has a history dating before 1917, except the 28th Division of the Pennsylvania National Guard (though the 27th Infantry Brigade of the New York National Guard carries the lineage of the pre-World War I predecessor of the 27th Division). The lineage of those proud divisions, corps, and armies of the Civil War and Spanish American War are no longer found in the Active force. The US Army has a great history, and its men and units made that history both in times of war and peace. The historical connection between yesterday's generation of soldiers and today's soldiers are the units themselves. That connection should never be broken lightly. Soldiers should have the opportunity to know what their predecessors did and accomplished, even in peacetime. I hope this work contributes to that goal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIke Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library (US Army Combined Arms Center)Same topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207