U.S. to face Colombia in World Cup knockout round
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Germany vs. Sweden kicks off Round of 16 Saturday The path to a third World Cup title for the U.S. women's national team is now set. The U.S. will open the knockout round of the 2015 Cup against Columbia, the 28th-ranked team in the world. Considering the U.S. allowed just one goal in its three group stage matches, coach Jill Ellis says they're feeling strong heading into the Round of 16... CUT The US will play Colombia Monday, with the winner of that match playing either China or Cameroon in the quarterfinals. If the US makes it to the semis, no potential matchup will be easy. Kicking off the knockout round Saturday will be no. 1 ranked Germany and Sweden, which fought the U.S. to a draw in the group stage. The No. 3 team in the world, France, is also a possible semifinal opponent, if they can start a run by getting past South Korea Sunday. The other first round Sunday matchups include Brazil vs. Australia, and hosts Canada facing Switzerland. Norway will play England Monday, and defending champions Japan will square off with the Netherlands Tuesday.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".