URANYL DEPOSITION IN UNCONFORMITY-RELATED DEPOSITS IN THE ATHABASCA BASIN: EVIDENCE FROM URANIUM SPECIATION IN HEMATITE AND GOETHITE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the exception of the recently discovered stable U4+ chloride complex at high temperatures under reduced conditions, genetic models for the formation of uranium deposits had almost invariably invoked the pivotal roles of soluble U6+ species for the transport of uranium-bearing fluids and their reduction to sparingly soluble U4+ as the deposition mechanism. However, the questions of when and how this reduction in most uranium deposits such as those in the Athabasca basin (Canada) occurred are often not clear. The unconformity-related uranium deposits in the Athabasca basin are commonly accompanied by extensive and intensive hematite-rich alteration halos. Previous U L3-edge XANES studies of uranium-bearing fluid inclusions and thermodynamic modeling demonstrated uranium transport as uranyl (UO22+) species in hypersaline fluids in the Athabasca basin. Electron microprobe analyses reveal that hematite inclusions in two early generations of secondary quartz overgrowth, as well as some disseminated hematite in clay mineral (illite-chlorite) matrices, in both orebodies and associated alteration haloes from five uranium deposits (Arrow, Cigar Lake, Key Lake, McArthur River, and Phoenix) in the Athabasca basin, contain anomalously high contents of uranium (up to 2.16 wt.% UO3). Synchrotron U L3-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and U 4f X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses show that uranium in hematite occurs dominantly as the uranyl species, providing unambiguous evidence for direct uranyl deposition in the Athabasca basin. This mechanism of direct uranyl deposition with hematite and other minerals such as quartz (or their amorphous or microcrystalline precursors) during a single episode of hydrothermal alteration can account for low-grade uranium mineralization, but high-grade uranium deposits in the Athabasca basin required multiple episodes of hydrothermal alteration and reduction-induced deposition mechanisms. In addition, synchrotron U L3-edge XAS analyses show that uraniferous goethite associated with boltwoodite in late alteration assemblages of mineralized metapelites at the Eagle Point deposit is also dominated by the uranyl species, supporting its roles in late uranium remobilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".