MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034705565

Why is the atmosphere over land becoming drier? Exploring the roles of atmospheric and land-surface processes on relative humidity

2022· dissertation· en· W7034705565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicScience and Climate Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative humidityAtmosphere (unit)HumidityVegetation (pathology)Water vaporWater cycleIntertropical Convergence ZoneClimate modelClimate changeTropics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relative humidity (RH) over land has declined steeply since 2000. This drying is broadly consistent from the edge of the deep tropics to the mid-latitudes of both hemispheres, whereas regions equatorward and poleward show increasing RH trends. The drying trend observed in the gridded global humidity dataset, HadISDH, is not captured by the CMIP5 climate models. This can be mostly explained through thermodynamic drivers, i.e. faster land-than-ocean warming under global warming. Insufficient water vapour is thus evaporated and transported from the oceans to keep RH over land constant. However, there are notable regional and seasonal differences in the trend. This thesis explores how dynamical and terrestrial drivers, which are less well represented in the models, can explain changes in RH. RH was analysed regionally. Strong drying trends were found over eastern Brazil, Tibet, the Caspian Sea, California, Mongolia, southern Africa, southwestern Greenland, eastern USA and the Red Sea. Strong wetting trends were found over Scandinavia, northwestern India and eastern Canada. The relationship between these regional trends and a range of dynamical drivers (precipitation, sea surface temperatures [SST], wind direction and speed, as well as pressure systems and the most common modes of climate variability) were explored. The influence of terrestrial drivers was also examined through evaporation and soil moisture, terrestrial water storage, the vegetation structure, and the modelled carbon cycle response to increased CO2 through CMIP5 experiments. Key findings are as follows. The thermodynamic driver can be detected on small scales (e.g. the Caspian Sea). Of the dynamical drivers, a latitudinal shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone due to tropical Atlantic SST changes reduced precipitation and thus water availability for RH over eastern Brazil. A wind direction change on different spatial scales leads to changes in RH in many regions (e.g. Greenland, southern Africa, eastern Canada). This work found a complex interplay of modes of variability behind the dynamical drivers, often influencing the RH trend through extreme years. In terms of terrestrial drivers, anthropogenic water management and land cover/land-use change affected surface and underground water availability over northern India, Mongolia and Tibet, and a modelled response of plants to increased CO2 was found to decrease specific humidity and RH by a small amount. Despite widespread drying trends, no evidence of large-scale effects from non-thermo-dynamical drivers could be found. Instead, dynamical and terrestrial drivers were found to influence RH on regional to sub-regional and seasonal scales, and complex interactions between the drivers and RH were found. Drivers such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) were found to influence strong peaks/troughs in RH in a number of regions which influenced trends over short timescales. This small-scale variability in drivers may indicate why climate models do not closely replicate the RH decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Same topicScience and Climate StudiesFrench-language works237,207