Una estrategia poco utilizada en el cuidado de pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica: la educación en grupo y multidisciplinar de pacientes y sus familiares A little-used strategy in caring for patients with chronic kidney disease: multidisciplinary education of patients and their relatives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los equipos multidisciplinares, son una estrategia sugerida hace ya más de un decenio por grupos canadienses. Los pacientes tratados en un ámbito multidisciplinar demuestran un mejor conocimiento de la enfermedad renal crónica y mejores parámetros bioquímicos. Los objetivos fueron, aumentar los conocimientos, en nuestros pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada y su familia, sobre su enfermedad, su correcto cuidado y sobre el tratamiento renal sustitutivo, a través de la educación en grupo. Valorar si la información aumenta el nivel de ansiedad de los pacientes. Valorar el grado de satisfacción con la intervención educación en grupo. Estudio retrospectivo que contó con 19 pacientes, asistentes a los dos cursos. Se realizaron dos cuestionarios al inicio y al final del curso sobre nivel de conocimientos y el nivel de ansiedad (Inventario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo). Al final de cada edición, se realizó un cuestionario de evaluación. Las variables estudiadas fueron el sexo, edad, nivel de estudios y asistencia de un familiar. El nivel de conocimientos alcanzó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ambos cuestionarios (inicial-final) (p = 0,013). Los resultados obtenidos en la evaluación del nivel de ansiedad mostraron un ligero incremento en la ansiedad. El cuestionario de satisfacción mostró una valoración muy positiva de la intervención. Podemos concluir, que la mayoría de los pacientes han aumentado sus conocimientos sobre enfermedad renal crónica avanzada y técnicas de sustitución, han demostrado una alta satisfacción con la experiencia de esta intervención y la mayoría han experimentado un ligero aumento de ansiedad.<br>Multidisciplinary teams are a strategy that was suggested more than ten years ago by Canadian groups. Patients treated in an multidisciplinary environment show better knowledge of CKD and better biochemical parameters. The goals were to increase knowledge in our patients with ACKD and their family about their illness, correct care and renal replacement therapy, through group education, to evaluate whether the information increased the patients' level of anxiety and to evaluate the degree of satisfaction with the group education. This is a retrospective study carried out with 19 patients, who attended both courses. Two questionnaires were completed at the start and end of the course on the level of knowledge and level of anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI). At the end of each course, an assessment questionnaire was completed. The variables studied were sex, age, level of education and presence of a relative. The level of knowledge reached a statistically significant difference between the two questionnaires (start-end) (p = 0.013). The results obtained in the evaluation of the level of anxiety showed a slight increase in anxiety. The satisfaction questionnaire showed a very positive evaluation of the action. We can conclude that most of the patients have increased their knowledge of ACKD and replacement techniques, have shown a high degree of satisfaction with the experience of this intervention and most have experienced a slight increase in anxiety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it