MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034774537

Virkninger av forurensning på biologisk mangfold: Vann og vassdrag i by - og tettstednære områder. Fastsittende alger i rennende vann - en kunnskapsstatus

2000· report· no· W7034774537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2000
Typereport
Languageno
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Application Security Vulnerabilities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Structuring
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Det gis en kunnskapsstatus for mangfold av fastsittende alger i rennende vann i Norge. Det fokuseres på variasjoner i mangfold langs naturgitte og menneskeskapte gradienter. Artsmangfoldet er stort, de mest artsrike gruppene er cyanobakterier, grønnalger og kiselalger. Mange har tydelige geografiske tyngdepunkt i Norge og ikke alle ser ut til å være kosmopolitter. Mangfoldet per stasjon dobles fra vår til sommer/høst. Brukes artsantall på den enkelte lokalitet som kriterium bidrar særlig fosfor og tungmetaller til redusert mangfold. Langs en gradient av fosfor er mangfoldet maksimalt ved 3-7 µg totP/L, over 20 µg totP/L er mangfoldet halvert. At det ikke er dokumentert noe generelt avtak i mangfoldet langs gradienter av pH og totN skyldes trolig at næringsstoffene karbon og nitrogen opptrer i ulike tilstandsformer langs disse gradientene. Det er forøvrig dokumentert markerte artsutskiftninger langs gradienter av kalsium, pH, totP og totN. Det er ikke dokumentert direkte tap av fastsittende alger i Norge, men flere forhold tilsier at dette er sannsynlig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicWeb Application Security VulnerabilitiesFrench-language works237,207