MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034800409

University of Minnesota Board of Regents Minutes: September 10, 1912

2008· other· en· W7034800409 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Graduate EducationU.S. Public Health ServiceSeoul National UniversityW.K. Kellogg FoundationFoundation MedicineMcGill UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaMayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchEli Lilly and CompanyUniversity of Minnesota FoundationU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationProcter and GambleNational Science Foundation
KeywordsService (business)Cover (algebra)Civil serviceEditorial board
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Board of Regents and Regents Committee meetings regularly cover legislature, degrees, faculty, research, tenure, salaries, civil service staff, campus planning, buildings in St. Paul and Minneapolis, and land purchases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5210.365

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)Same topicLegal Issues in EducationFrench-language works237,207