Validation of a numerical model for seismic analysis of a telecommunication tower mounted on a building rooftop in Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses the validation of two models of a five-floor concrete building located in \nTaiwan. The building supports a 10-m high self-supporting lattice telecommunication tower on its rooftop. \nThe purpose of modelling is to assess the functionality of the tower and operational and functional \ncomponents attached to the building during and after earthquakes. Monitoring data available includes 18 \nfloor acceleration records at various levels from the basement to the roof, and three acceleration records \nat the tower mid-height. The combined building-tower structure was modelled using the commercial \nsoftware SAP2000. Dynamic time history analyses were performed using basement acceleration records \nfrom the 1999 Chi Chi earthquake. The calculated floor and tower accelerations are compared to the \nrecorded data. Of particular interest are the amplification of the floor accelerations along the building \nheight, from the basement to the roof, and the dynamic amplification of the tower response with respect to \nthe response at roof level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".