MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7034876137

Volunteer canola (Brassica napus L.) interference with soybean (Glycine max L. [Merr.])

2017· dissertation· en· W7034876137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionHyporeflexiaGestational periodDiafiltrationTSG101HemopericardiumLiquationDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean (Glycine max L. [Merr.]) has become a popular crop choice for producers in Manitoba. In 2012 and 2013, 6 paired field experiments were established across southern Manitoba, three experiments seeded with a row-spacing of 25 cm, and three seeded with a row-spacing of 75 cm. Increasing densities of volunteer canola were broadcasted to determine the action threshold in soybean as well as evaluate soybean growth and development parameters. Height and branching were determined to be important parameters. The action threshold in narrow row-spaced soybean was 3.0 plants m-2 while the wide row-spaced soybean action threshold was 2.7 plants m-2. Digital images were captured between V3 and V4 to determine if early-season volunteer canola and soybean ground cover can be related to yield loss in soybean. There were no apparent differences between row types for image analysis and the method shows promise relating early-season ground cover to soybean yield loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→