Winckelmanns Idee der Schönheit und ihr Einfluss auf Walter Pater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following work deals with the idea of Beauty as seen in the work of \nWinckelmann and its influence on Walter Pater, the English critic. The \nconcept of Beauty is to be analyzed chronologically. First of all, the concept \nof Beauty in Winckelmannâs work will be analysed and its particularities will \nbe described. Further, the concept of Beauty will be analyzed in so far as it \nchanges throughout time and influences the further development of aesthetic \ntheory. Hegel takes up Winckelmannâs idea of Beauty and uses this idea in \nhis own aesthetic theory. Walter Pater takes up and develops the idea of \nBeauty not only from Winckelmann, but also from Hegel. The influence of \nboth art critics, Winckelmann and Hegel, on Walter Pater will be shown in \nthis thesis. The latter, as this thesis shows, was to develop his own aesthetic \ntheory, which is supported by the concept of Beauty in Winckelmann and \nHegel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".