MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034976409

Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Laserstrahlschneiden von Werkstuecken

2007· other· en· W7034976409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleDeflection (physics)LaserLaser beamsBeam (structure)Laser cuttingInlet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DE 102007042493 B3 UPAB: 20081128 NOVELTY - The device for laser cutting of metallic workpieces, comprises a nozzle (1) with a cutting gas for arranging a movable laser beam (2) on the workpiece, a housing, a linear drive for electrically, pneumatically or hydraulically swiveling the nozzle, and two plane-plane lenses, a focusing optical lens and tiltable optical elements for deflection and formation of the laser beam. The nozzle is formed as slit Laval-nozzle, has an inner free cross-section, and shrinks along the longitudinal axis from a cutting gas inlet (1.1) to an area (1.3) with small inner cross-section in a converging manner. DETAILED DESCRIPTION - The device for laser cutting of metallic workpieces, comprises a nozzle (1) with a cutting gas for arranging a movable laser beam (2) on the workpiece, a housing, a linear drive for electrically, pneumatically or hydraulically swiveling the nozzle, and two plane-plane lenses, a focusing optical lens and tiltable optical elements for deflection and formation of the laser beam. The nozzle is formed as slit nozzle-nozzle, has an inner free cross-section, shrinks along the longitudinal axis from a cutting gas inlet (1.1) to an area (1.3) with small inner cross-section in a converging manner and then enlarges in the direction of a cutting gas outlet (1.2) in diverging manner. The laser beam is movable with tiltable optical elements so that it is tiltable around the center of rotation (A). The optical elements for deflection and/or forming the laser beam and the nozzle are arranged in/at the housing tiltable around an axis. The focusing optical element and a part the housing are adjustable along the laser beam axis for changing the position of the focal point of the focused laser beam. The nozzle is held in a guidance. The nozzles having different dimension and/or different internal cross-section geometry are exchangeably mounted on the device. The inner wall of the nozzle is convex in the converging area and is concave or convex at the area with the smallest internal cross-section in the diverging area. The nozzle is tiltably arranged over an axis around a focal point arranged in the area of the small inner cross-section within the nozzle. The converging and the diverging area in the inside of the nozzle have a cone angle of 1-20 degrees . The area of the nozzle with the small internal cross-section in the center is arranged between the cutting gas inlet and the cutting gas outlet. The area with the free cross-section has an expansion of 5 mm in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the nozzle. The cutting gas inlet has a free cross-section area, which is 1-5 times greater than the free cross-section area of the cutting gas outlet, which has an inner diameter of 3-20 mm. The free cross-section area in the inner cross-section of the nozzle is 0.7-40 mm2. The nozzle is rotatably arranged around its longitudinal axis. The plane-plane lens is tiltable around an axis. An INDEPENDENT CLAIM is included for a procedure for laser cutting metallic workpieces with a device. USE - Device for laser cutting of metallic workpieces. ADVANTAGE - The device ensures economical and fast laser cutting of metallic workpieces with less consumption of cutting gas, and improves cutting edge quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.154

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft)Same topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207