Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My bachelor thesis is titled "The experience of students with mobbing". Its aim was to determine whether employed students of the tertiary professional school Jabok and students of the Protestant Theological Faculty of the Charles University studying social work and pastoral care have experience with mobbing. The theoretical part contains the characteristics of mobbing and related concepts, actors and phases of mobbing. The special chapters are devoted to the categories of mobbing attacks, strategies of mobbing and preventive techniques against mobbing. The practical part consists of a description, a data analysis and an evaluation of results, in which 40 respondents took part. The aim of the survey was to explore whether employed students of social work are at risk of mobbing and to find out what types of attacks typical for mobbing are parts of their work experience. The results were then compared with the results of the author of this questionnaire, Petr Mareš. The results showed that students experience with mobbing in their jobs is comparable to a number of attacks on civil servants and more than a quarter of students are threatened by mobbing, or even experiencing ongoing mobbing. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it