MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7035728682

Achieving online big data processing: from offline to online data analytics

2017· dissertation· en· W7035728682 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataScalabilityPipeline (software)Volume (thermodynamics)AnalyticsData processingData modelingData analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, a huge volume of data is increasingly produced by various sources, such as mobile sensing devices, system logs, and user activities over Internet.Accordingly, the information hidden in the massive size of data has a great potential to change and benefit our lives in many fields.To explore the values from data, researchers have made efforts to provide solutions to accommodate the big data applications.These applications not only require scalability on computation and storage but also bring a pressing challenge on data processing speed.If the data processing speed cannot catch up with the data generation speed, the computing results provided by the data analytic systems will be useless.Additionally, in many applications such as real-time recommendation system and web index maintenance, dataset involved in the computation needs to be frequently updated.To catch the change of individual data items and deliver the correct result reactively under the fast evolving dataset, we have to adopt online data analytic systems.Unfortunately, there exists a gap between the state-of-the-art data analytic system and the requirement of the online data analytics.It prevents the current data analytic systems/algorithms from being adopted in the more challenging, yet more realistic, online scenarios.In this thesis, we identify three major requirements to move the conventional offline computing systems to online: (1) First, we need to build a fluent online processing pipeline which consumes input data reactively and with high throughput; (2) We desire a storage layer which serves online query and update to the computing state so that it can deliver the results adaptively against the fast evolving dataset; (3) Finally, while moving from offline to online, the data analytic systems should be backward compatible to its offline counterparts, hence, we need to keep the maximum compatibility with infrastructure, programming model, etc.ii In this thesis, we study the solutions to fulfill these three requirements.(1) We design and implement the micro-batch-based online data processing pipeline with fine-grained resource allocation to avoid the per-record backup and handle the highly-skewed computing demands, e.g.videos with various length.(2) We build a parallel-friendly and high-performance computing state management system based on Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH).Our system differentiates with the conventional LSH system in that it does not need to reconstruct itself to serve the online update requests and adopt multiple system-oriented optimization strategies to scale to large storage size and the multi-cores environment.(3) We achieve the scalable, efficient and reliable computing state management for online data analytics by introducing Resilient State Table (RST) as a component of Spark.So the system we have designed can seamlessly integrate with the programming model and scheduling policy of the original Spark framework.We evaluate our design in various scenarios.Our design exceeds the performance of the state-of-the-art systems in many application domains, e.g. the content-based video indexing, high dimensional nearest neighbors search, real-time web index maintenance, and machine learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0100.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPlant and soil sciencesFrench-language works237,207