Antecedentes históricos constitucionales canadienses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La evolución de la Constitución canadiense refleja el desarrollo de la historia de Canadá en sí misma. A través del estudio de los antecedentes históricos constitucionales se percibe los esfuerzos realizados por un pueblo, con diversos sistemas legales y culturas, para establecer la forma de operación de gobierno y de instituciones a regir en Canadá. El actual sistema legal canadiense tiene su origen principalmente en el sistema inglés, traído a América del Norte por el Imperio británico, y en menor proporción en el sistema francés, traído por los colonizadores franceses. Hay que destacar en la evolución constitucional el sistema desarrollado por los primeros aborígenes canadienses y la protección que el sistema constitucional le ha reconocido a la cultura, derechos y tratados de esta minoría. Salvo Quebec, donde el derecho civil está fundado en el Código napoleónico adoptado en Francia, el derecho penal y el derecho civil en vigor en Canadá se derivan de las leyes y el derecho consuetudinario inglés. Abstract The evolution of Canada Constitution shows the development of Canada’s history itself. Through the study of the constitutional historical antecedents one can see the efforts undertaken by its people, with different legal systems and cultures, to establish the governmental and institutional procedure forms ruling Canada. The actual legal system has its origin mostly in the English system. Which was brought to North America by the British Empire and in less proportion in the French system brought by French colonizers. One can also stress the constitutional evolution of the system developed by early Canadian natives and the protection the present constitutional system has recognized for their culture, rights and treaties subscribed with them. With the exception of Quebec, whose civil law is grounded on the Napoleon Code adopted in France, penal law and civil law in force in Canada are derived from the English law and consuetudinary right.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".