MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7035732799

Antecedentes históricos constitucionales canadienses

2013· article· es· W7035732799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Main Institutional Repository University of the North (Universidad del Norte) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Context (archaeology)NucleofectionPretext
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La evolución de la Constitución canadiense refleja el desarrollo de la historia de Canadá en sí misma. A través del estudio de los antecedentes históricos constitucionales se percibe los esfuerzos realizados por un pueblo, con diversos sistemas legales y culturas, para establecer la forma de operación de gobierno y de instituciones a regir en Canadá. El actual sistema legal canadiense tiene su origen principalmente en el sistema inglés, traído a América del Norte por el Imperio británico, y en menor proporción en el sistema francés, traído por los colonizadores franceses. Hay que destacar en la evolución constitucional el sistema desarrollado por los primeros aborígenes canadienses y la protección que el sistema constitucional le ha reconocido a la cultura, derechos y tratados de esta minoría. Salvo Quebec, donde el derecho civil está fundado en el Código napoleónico adoptado en Francia, el derecho penal y el derecho civil en vigor en Canadá se derivan de las leyes y el derecho consuetudinario inglés. Abstract The evolution of Canada Constitution shows the development of Canada’s history itself. Through the study of the constitutional historical antecedents one can see the efforts undertaken by its people, with different legal systems and cultures, to establish the governmental and institutional procedure forms ruling Canada. The actual legal system has its origin mostly in the English system. Which was brought to North America by the British Empire and in less proportion in the French system brought by French colonizers. One can also stress the constitutional evolution of the system developed by early Canadian natives and the protection the present constitutional system has recognized for their culture, rights and treaties subscribed with them. With the exception of Quebec, whose civil law is grounded on the Napoleon Code adopted in France, penal law and civil law in force in Canada are derived from the English law and consuetudinary right.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it