MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7035879816

Análisis histórico, antropológico, teórico y mediático del uso de minas antipersonales en Colombia

2013· article· es· W7035879816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)FrontierContext (archaeology)Scale (ratio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La primera mina antipersonal fue creada por un ingeniero ruso en 1855, se manipularon como protección de las llamadas minas antiataque. A partir de 1945, las minas se crearon bajo preceptos de: eficacia, tamaño, y detectabilidad. La utilización de este artefacto se convirtió en un problema para el mundo, y en respuesta a este conflicto internacional se creó la Convención de Ottawa. En territorio Colombiano desde 1990 comenzó a incursionar con esta práctica, y en los últimos 15 años las víctimas pasaron de 20 a mil por año, cifra que afecta el cumplimiento de los DDHHH y lleva al país a ocupar el tercer lugar en el mundo después de Camboya y Afganistán.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectum (Universidad de La Sabana)Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207