Actes du colloque étudiant : Art et Politique : les enjeux de la localité dans les pratique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette publication rassemble cinq des neuf propositions retenues pour la septième édition du colloque étudiant du \nLaboratoire/Art et Société/Terrains et Théories (L/AS/TT). Ce colloque tenu annuellement depuis 2014, mais ajourné en 2020 pour cause de pandémie, a comme \nobjectif de sonder périodiquement l’état des recherches en cours chez les étudiants et étudiantes liées au laboratoire, qui portent sur les dimensions sociales des pratiques artistiques et qui mettent en œuvre des perspectives ainsi que des démarches simultanément théoriques et empiriques. L’ajournement inattendu de l’événement du 20 mars 2020 a été \nl’occasion pour le comité organisateur de convertir le colloque en un processus de publication en bonne et due forme. Organisé par des étudiants et étudiantes des cycles supérieurs affilié·e·s au L/AS/TT, ce colloque interuniversitaire et pluridisciplinaire ancré à Montréal en \nmilieu francophone est également ouvert aux propositions de langue anglaise. Les textes publiés font ainsi état de cet \nenvironnement bilingue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".