Agreement between Lewis Shickluna, St. Catharines and M.W. and E. Browne of Hamilton to build a schooner, 1845
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(Spelling and grammar are as these appear in the document) Agreement between Lewis Shickluna of the Town of Saint Catharines, and M. W. & E Browne of the Town of Hamilton both places, Canada West. __________ That the aforesaid Lewis Shickluna is to build a Schooner length to Keel to be One Hundred and ten feet, the remainder to be, as laid down in the Estimate which will be signed by both parties , a copy to be made out and signed as above so that each party may always have a reference to the agreement. __________ For and in consideration of the building the above mentioned Schooner the aforesaid M. W. & E. Browne is to pay the aforesaid Lewis Shickluna the Sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Pounds Halifax Currency, to be paid as follows. __________ Four Hundred pound to be paid now out of his Store. __________ Two Schooners the Kent and Telegraph for and in consideration of Seven Hundred pounds, the above Schooners to be delivered to the said Lewis Shickluna at St. Catharines in the fall of this year one Thousand Eight Hundred and forty five.__________ The above Schooners are valued at as follows __________ The Kent 400 Pounds __________ [The] Telegraph 300 [Pounds) __________ Two Hundred pounds when the Vessel is all in frame. __________ Two Hundred pounds when planked. __________ Two Hundred pounds when Launched. __________ Two Hundred pounds Three Months after the Launch payable at the Bank of ... __________ And Two Hundred pounds Six Months after the Launch payable at the Bank of ... __________ Given under our hands and seals this ... day of ... In the year of our Lord one Thousand Eight Hundred and forty five.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".