MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7035954792

Anti-Mullerian hormone as a marker of oocyte quantity, developmental potential, and fetal sex

2017· dissertation· en· W7035954792 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnti-Müllerian hormoneGestationFollicular phaseFetusHormoneFertilityFollicular fluidOocytePregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delayed childbearing age, increased environmental pollutants accompanying modern life style, and an increase in inbreeding due to high demand for milk and meat yield have resulted in the decline in human and bovine reproduction respectively. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is expressed starting from 7-8 weeks of gestation in males and 20 weeks of gestation in females, in up to 100x higher concentration in males. AMH has been described as a non-invasive and accurate marker of ovarian quantitative fertility parameters in both humans and cattle. However, it is still unknown how AMH levels correlate to different fertility parameters in different cattle breeds; can AMH levels in the mother be used as a fetal sex marker during pregnancy in cows? In humans, can AMH collected in the single follicular fluid (mono FF), as well as granulosa cell (GC) AMH receptor 2 (AMHR2) be used as an embryo developmental potential marker? Here we present evidence of the higher levels of systemic and follicular AMH in Zebu compared to European cattle, corresponding to higher levels of AFC and oocytes. Cows pregnant with a male fetus, as compared to a female fetus, were observed to have a significantly different change in plasma AMH between day 35 and 135 during gestation. The placenta and cotyledon were found to express AMHR2 between day 38 and 80, however not significantly different between pregnancies with an opposite sex fetus. In the human study, systemic and average mono FF AMH, and average mono GC AMHR2 expression were significantly negatively correlated with the patient’s blastocyst rate. When patients were divided into normal and high groups based on the their systemic AMH levels, the following was observed: normal systemic AMH level patients had a lower average FF AMH level and a higher blastocyst rate compared to the higher systemic AMH level patients. Also, in normal systemic AMH patients, blastocysts corresponded to follicles with a lower level of AMH, while in high systemic AMH patients blastocysts corresponded to follicles with a higher level of AMH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207