MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036116559

Annual international shorebird expeditions to Rio Grande in Tierra del Fuego 2000-2004

2005· article· en· W7036116559 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConicet · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsFeatherPopulationTierraArcticMoultingCalidrisWaterfowl
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We organized annual expeditions to Rio Grande in Argentinian Tierra del Fuego from 2000 to 2004 to census, capture and band Red Knots Calidris canutus after their arrival on the southern migration from Arctic breeding grounds. The population declined from about 6,000 birds in 2000 to 4,000 in 2004. A total of 2,214 knots were banded, of which 1,787 were adults, 287 immatures and only 140 juveniles. Of 312 retraps, 88 had been banded previously at Rio Grande and the remainder were from localities in South America and Delaware Bay, USA. Average mass of the adults in the 2004 sample was significantly lower than in all other years (p < 0.0028), consistent with the fact that they had arrived three weeks later arrival at Rio Grande that year. Additionally, in both adults and immatures, average mass in 2002 was significantly lower than in 2000–2001 or 2003. Late arrival of adults in 2004 delayed wing moult and the intensity of body moult relative to other years. Studies of pathogens and parasites, feather isotopes and sex-specific survival are underway to try to elucidate possible additional causes of the severe and continuing population decline in the rufa population of the Red Knot. consistent with the fact that they had arrived three weeks later arrival at Rio Grande that year. Additionally, in both adults and immatures, average mass in 2002 was significantly lower than in 2000–2001 or 2003. Late arrival of adults in 2004 delayed wing moult and the intensity of body moult relative to other years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConicetSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207