MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036175563

Ataxie récessive spastique de Charlevoix-Saguenay aptitudes des membres supérieurs et habitudes de vie

2002· other· fr· W7036175563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2002
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender relationsGender identityQuadriceps muscle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectif : Cette étude visait à définir les atteintes sensitivo-motrices aux membres supérieurs (MS) et à explorer leurs relations avec la performance globale des MS. Elle visait aussi à explorer les relations entre la performance globale des MS, l'indépendance fonctionnelle et les habitudes de vie, définies ici comme étant les activités courantes et les rôles sociaux d'une personne. Méthodologie. Cette étude pilote descriptive a suivi un dispositif de recherche transversal. Vingt-quatre participants ont été recrutés selon un processus d'échantillonnage aléatoire stratifié selon l'âge (<40 ans et [plus grand ou égal]40 ans) et le sexe. Les aptitudes sensitivo-motrices suivantes ont été évaluées avec des instruments de mesure standardisés et validés: la coordination (test doigt-nez modifié), la dextérité grossière (Box and Block Test), la dextérité fine (Purdue Pegboard test), la force au membre supérieur (dynamomètre Jamar, pincemètre B&L, Microfet-2), le tonus musculaire (Échelle de Asworth modifiée) et le sens kinesthésique (articulation interphalangienne du pouce). De plus, la performance globale des MS (TEMPA), l'indépendance fonctionnelle (MIF) et les habitudes de vie (MHAVIE) ont été mesurées. Chaque participant a été évalué à deux occasions, dont l'une à son domicile.--Résumé abrégé par UMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)Same topicFood Drying and ModelingFrench-language works237,207