Barriers and Facilitators to Children Wearing a Sports Mouthguard: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic review on the identification of the barriers and facilitators of wearing a sports mouthguard among children. For this, A systematic search was done from different databases following PRISMA guidelines. The six different databases including (Ovid MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Embase, Embase Classic, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched, including the search terms related to the topic. 1470 records were identified, 36 studies were included in this systematic review. The data was collected using a modified data extraction form. The barriers and facilitators found were put into five sociological levels of influence based on the Theoretical Domains Framework domains (individual, interpersonal, organisational, community, and public policy). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to measure the risk of bias in the included studies. The discovered barriers and facilitators were classified into seven TDF domains, including knowledge, beliefs about consequences, intentions, memory, attention and decision process, environmental context and resources, social influence, and emotions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.061 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".