Barriers and Facilitators to Children Wearing a Sports Mouthguard: A Systematic Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic review on the identification of the barriers and facilitators of wearing a sports mouthguard among children. For this, A systematic search was done from different databases following PRISMA guidelines. The six different databases including (Ovid MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Embase, Embase Classic, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched, including the search terms related to the topic. 1470 records were identified, 36 studies were included in this systematic review. The data was collected using a modified data extraction form. The barriers and facilitators found were put into five sociological levels of influence based on the Theoretical Domains Framework domains (individual, interpersonal, organisational, community, and public policy). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to measure the risk of bias in the included studies. The discovered barriers and facilitators were classified into seven TDF domains, including knowledge, beliefs about consequences, intentions, memory, attention and decision process, environmental context and resources, social influence, and emotions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it