MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036280070

Bacterial endophytes of plants used for soil reclamation

2018· dissertation· en· W7036280070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizosphereMicroorganismLand reclamationMicrobiomeSoil microbiologyPantoeaMicrobial population biologyBacterial wiltNutrient
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microorganisms that colonize the plant rhizosphere and root tissues may provide host plants with nutrients, stimulate growth and increase tolerance to abiotic stress. These plant-microbe associations are also being investigated to assist land reclamation in Alberta's oil sands. However, these newly reconstructed landscapes may be limited by several factors that include low soil nutrient levels, reduced microbial activity and the presence of residual hydrocarbons. This study was designed to assess the bacterial root microbiome of plants growing in oil sands reclamation covers and investigate the potential use of bacterial endophytes in phytoremediation. Soil microbial community structure in these areas was mainly driven by soil total and organic carbon, NH4+ and organic matter. In addition, an assessment of the bacterial root microbiome associated with sweet clover (Melilotus albus) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) strongly suggests that plants have the ability to select for certain soil bacterial consortia. Sweet clover plants were more selective and mainly associated with Sinorhizobium and Rhizobium, whereas Acholeplasma was unique to barley. Furthermore, genera such as Pseudomonas and Pantoea were able to successfully colonize both plants. However, due to the presence of residual hydrocarbons in these areas, plants may rely on association with hydrocarbon degrading endophytes. Therefore, an assessment of unculturable endophytic communities revealed that sweet clover had higher CYP153 gene copy numbers when compared to barley. In addition, a total of 42 endophytic bacteria isolates tested positive for hydrocarbon degrading genes and were further investigated for their application as inoculants. Based on overall growth promoting effects, sweet clover plants and four different bacterial strains were selected for phytoremediation experiments. Despite plant growth inhibition caused by diesel fuel toxicity, an overall higher plant biomass was observed in inoculated plants. However, only at high diesel concentrations did bacterial inoculants enhanced soil hydrocarbon degradation.\n\nIn conclusion, bacterial species associated with plants growing in reclamation covers were mainly driven by plant factors and this microbiome harbors endophytes that can be potentially used in phytoremediation. In particular, bacterial endophytes such as Pantoea and Pseudomonas species in association with sweet clover plants were shown to successfully reduce petroleum hydrocarbons in soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207