Biology and culture of Penaeus monodon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its establishment in 1973, the SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department (AQD) has undertaken pioneering R & D work on prawn culture.Results of these experimental and pilot studies have been disseminated through various publications, training, and extension programs.At least half of the approximately 260 AQD papers published in scientific journals and edited proceedings as of mid-1988 are on prawns and shrimps.In 1984, the Department organized the First International Conference on the Culture of Penaeid Prawns/Shrimps which gathered around 300 of the world's leading scientists and prawn culturists.It is within this historical perspective that AQD has prepared this state-of-the-art review of the biology and culture of P. monodon.Individual reviews on biology, maturation, larval rearing, grow-out, nutrition, and diseases have been authored by AQD researchers who are authorities in their respective fields.Each paper consolidates and synthesizes current information on the biology and culture of P. monodon generated both from within the Department and outside.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".