MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036409464

Book review of "The L.M. Montgomery Reader, Volume One: a life in print" by Benjamin Lefebvre (ed). Toronto, Canada, University of Toronto Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-1-4426-4491-5

2015· article· en· W7036409464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperFocus (optics)PublishingReading (process)Volume (thermodynamics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Extract] In this reader of previously uncollected materials, Benjamin Lefebvre sheds new light on L.M. Montgomery, a figure described by Irene Gammel as 'Canada's most enigmatic literary icon' (p. 5). In this first volume Lefebvre gathers eighty pieces ranging in date from the publication of Anne of Green Gables in 1908 until shortly after Montgomery's death in 1942. These materials include essays and letters written by Montgomery herself for various newspapers and periodicals, as well as a large collection of interviews and author profiles written about her that were published throughout her career. Many of these articles are hard to locate and largely inaccessible to the general public and scholarly community, ensuring that much of the content of this reader will be new even to long-standing Montgomery scholars and enthusiasts. Continuing in this vein, the second volume in this series, titled A Critical Heritage, will focus on reprinting 'milestones (p. 6) in Montgomery scholarship; the third, titled A Legacy in Review, will compile book reviews on Montgomery's work from newspapers, magazines and journals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Same topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207