Beta blockade and thermoregulation during exercise in post menopausal women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beta blockers have been available for approximately 30 years, and are used for the treatment of angina pectoris, dysrhythmias, and most commonly, hypertension (Kostis & DeFelice, 1984). Ten to 15% of Canadians have controlled or uncontrolled high blood pressure, including 25% of persons 65 and over. Approximately 60% of physician/patient contacts for high blood pressure involve women. Regular exercise has been suggested as a favourable lifestyle change for those with hypertension and can also improve thermoregulation during acute exercise in the heat. While other drugs are now available for the treatment of hypertension (as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers) beta blockers are well proven and still remain the primary drugs in the treatment of patients with elevated blood pressure. In light of the use of these drugs for the control of such problems, and the research suggesting that they may have a negative effect on thermoregulation, it is unfortunate that older womenhave been practically excluded from the research concerning exercise and heat stress. In this study, we examined the effects of beta blockade on thermoregulation in post-menopausal women during a cycle bout in the heat. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".