MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7036487843

Calls for papers and conferences / Conférences et demandes de communications

2020· article· fr· W7036487843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionContext (archaeology)French
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

48ème congrès de l'institut d'histoire de l'Amérique française à Ottawa. LES AMÉRIQUES FRANÇAISES.Le prochain congrès de l'institut d'histoire de l'Amérique française aura lieu les 20 et 21 octobre 1995 à Ottawa.Nous invitons les spécialistes québécois, canadiens et étrangers à nous soumettre, d'ici le 1er mars 1995, un projet de communication, accompagné d'un court résumé et d'un curriculum vitae, sur tout aspect de l'histoire des francophones de l'Amérique du Nord.Les organisateurs sont particulièrement intéressés à recevoir des propositions de communication portant sur l'histoire des francophones hors Québec (Acadie, Ontario, Ouest, Nouvelle-Angleterre, Louisiane, Antilles).Le congrès comportera également une série d'ateliers portant sur les problèmes spécifiques rencontrés par les chercheurs hors Québec: constitution et gestion de collections d'archives écrites ou orales, mise sur pied et diffusion de banques de données, intégration des résultats de la recherche dans les programmes d'études, préparation de matériel pédagogique, et publication.Les chercheurs, enseignants, archivistes, conservateurs de musées et éditeurs travaillant hors du Québec et intéressés à participer à ces ateliers sont priés de communiquer dès que possible avec les organisateurs du congrès.Comme à l'accoutumée, le comité organisateur prendra également en considération les communications hors thème susceptibles d'intéresser l'ensemble des participants au congrès. Envoyer les propositions de communication à Lise McNicoll,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5100.351

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→