Canada, Québec, Caraïbe : connexions transaméricaines Canada, Quebec, Caribbean: transamerican connections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce colloque transdisciplinaire et international a pour objectif de mettre en lumière les enjeux des relations « entre » la Caraïbe, le Québec et le Canada. Ces connexions transaméricaines, bien que souvent méconnues, s’inscrivent dans le temps long et sont diversifiées. Tourisme, coopérations scientifiques et techniques, extractions de ressources, migrations sont autant de déclinaisons des ponts tracés entre le centre géographique des Amériques et son extrémité septentrionale que nous souhaitons aborder au cours de cette rencontre. L'idée est alors de donner à voir et à comprendre les assemblages pluriels et originaux, qui naissent de ces connexions transaméricaines en passant « outre » l’hégémonie des États-Unis dans la région, et permettre d’aborder les Amériques au-delà des oppositions binaires entre Nord et Sud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Themed collection on Canada, Quebec and Caribbean cultural connections; no abstract, and the title indicates cultural studies rather than research-on-research.
The title alone indicates a regional Canada-Quebec-Caribbean topic but does not establish research as the object.
Title suggests cultural/geographic connections; no abstract and no indication research is the object.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.098 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".