MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7036496043

Budget speech delivered by Hon. George E. foster, Minister of Finance, in the House of Commons, Tuesday, 5th March, 1889.

2014· article· en· W7036496043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSympathyGeorge (robot)FeelingAction (physics)Government (linguistics)Natural (archaeology)Statement (logic)Point (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mr. FOSTER.Mr. Speaker, in rising to make my first financial statement beforo this House, it would not be otherwise than natural that I should experience feelings of trepidation, and even of timidity.When I look at the line of men, distinguished Canadians, who, since Confederation, have had entrusted to them the keeping of tbe purse-strings of this country, men in every case of acknowledged ability and of an experience far greater than my own ; when I have regard, as well, to the responsible nature of the duties which have been devolved upon me, and the fact that every action of the present leaves its impress upon the iuturo, I would be the reverse of serious op thoughtful if I did not threw myself to-day upon the kinJness of the House, and ask those who are older and more experienced than myself for their generous indulgence, and ask also for the equally generous sympathy of those who are, in point of years, more nearly my contemporaries and co-laborers in the work of this House.The wis© and vigorous policy of the preceding years, a kindly providence which, during the past year, has not forgotten this, one of her most favored countries, and a growing spirit of corifider.ee in commercial operations, have contributed to a fullness oi the Treasury, and to a peace and prosperity, geneial throughout the country, which serve to make easier the otheiwise formidable task which has fallen to my lot Canada tc-day, standing in this her majority year, and looking back upon the record of her past, has every reason, I thick, to survey that record with pride, and turning towards the future, although it may have its difficulties which are to be surmounted, I believe that from this same vantage giound she has every right to step foiwar<3 into that future, with full asturance that in it she will find peace, plenty, prosperity r-S 6 t~L i and continued greatness.Standing upon this point of vantage ground, this country asks no concealment of the real facts of her record, she asks no flattery, and while she does not wish to have concealed from her the difficulties incident to progress in all climes and in all ages, I think she is willing to stand by the record of facts, and whatever merits or demerits my statement may have, I trust, that so far as it goes, it will have the merit of candour, frankness and plainness of statement.With these few preliminary remarks, I beg the indulgence of the House while I proceed to the -Bcoks, Periodicals, &c , and all other printed matter % 4,864 89 Arrowroot, Biscuit, Rice, Macaroni, Bran, &c 48,836 53 Flour and Meal, of all kinds 54,120 76 Carriages 40,415 67 Coal and Coke (lutiable) , 420,546 89 Collars, Cuffs, and Shirt Fronts19,796 39 Cotton, manufactures cf • 197,860 52 Fancy Goods 73,277 73 Flax, Hemp, Jute, and manufactures of., 33,817 49 Fruit3, green -37,910 92 Glass, and manufactures of •. 9,503 36 Gold, Silver, and manufactures of.'. 16,220 33 Guttapercha, India Rubber, and manufactures of 8,419 18 Jewellery 13,152 22 Leather, aEd manufactures of 25,374 84 Oilcloth , 9,947 10 Silk, and manufactures of.. 32,612 20 Tic, do do 12,875 92 Tobacco, do do ~71,717 79 Wool, do do 1» be made to the House and the country.It is a condition of things which has not arisen from any increased rate of taxation, but under the very same tariff as the preceding year's receipts were based upon.Consequently, it shows an increased.ability to consume, and therefore an increase in the prosperity of the country.The -capital expenditure for 1888-89 is estimated as follows : -

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2840.113

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies→French-language works237,207→