MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036534034

CCSDS Operating Plan for Standards Development - CCSDS A01.2-Y-4-S

2006· article· en· W7036534034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyKorea Aerospace Research InstituteEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesIran Telecommunication Research CenterEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaU.S. Geological SurveyIndian Space Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Space OrganizationBelgian Federal Science Policy Office
KeywordsWork (physics)Plan (archaeology)Data systemProcess (computing)Data collectionConjunction (astronomy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CCSDS Operating Plan contains the charters of all of the CCSDS Working Groups that have been approved by the CCSDS Management Council. It covers a future period of roughly 24 months and is formally updated approximately once per year to reflect the current program of work for CCSDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it