Cannibalism by black bears in the Nimpkish Valley, British Columbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
\\c slldied black beafs (l/rrr\ r,,r.,r.drurr) betu een l99l rnd 1995 ln the Nimpkirh \tllc).!'uncouver lsland.Britrsh Columbia.Durlng 199'1.we observed '+ incidcnls oi cannib.rlismby black bcars.One incident ofcannibaiisn occurfed on adcmed.radiocollared iinulc lhat was con\Lrmed 390 l11 liom hef den and hcr 1$o cub littef that \|as consuned at tbe den sits.The second incidenl i.\'ohcd.rrrdio-collared nralc \ho consuned.rfemalc and her cub neaf their possibl.deD site \oon aiier dcn cmergence.T he third rnr_ident $,.r\ one cub of a luo cub litlef thirt was consumed 39 dals after irs diLr colhred molher crncrged fftm her dcn.The lbufth incident $a\ a subudult feDrale attacked bI ar adult male during aurumn befbre hiberrration.Sc!eral authors halc hypolhesized thrt males kill uffel.rtedcub\ to incrcasc their repfoduclive tirncss.h our studv.cannibalislic behrvior of malc bcars is unlikel) to ha\c cnhanced reproducti|e fitncs\ bec.ruse the bears in!ol!cd \iere resident!$ithin their n ting ranges.thus lhcreis.rhighlikelihoodlhalfiecubs\\'ererelatedlolhcaggre\sor'lhehighnrcideDceofcrnnibalisninourstucllduringtgg.li\ puzzling rnd inconsl,,tcnl $ilh e\plrrations which arrribute tbi\ beha\'ior 1o enhancenent of the finrcss oi n le be.Lr\.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it