Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the Impact of occupational hazards in the minerals industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the psychosocial, occupational, financial, and physical impact of \nchronic obstructive pulmonary disease on underground workers in the minerals industry in \nNortheastern Ontario, describe their experiences with the Ontario workers’ compensation claim \nprocess. This study also aimed to communicate experiences of physicians and union workers with \nunderground mineral workers diagnosed with COPD as an occupational illness and the Ontario \nworkers’ compensation claim process experience. Data were collected via semi-structured \ntelephone interviews with 16 underground mineral workers with occupational COPD, four union \ncompensation representatives and four physicians (two primary care and two specialists). \nInterviews were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was completed. Examples of themes \nthat arose from the findings of the underground mineral workers’ COPD group included: 1) COPD \naffects quality of life, 2) I smoked; I did not think I could get compensation, 3) the compensation \nprocess is a joke, 4) doctors do not know anything, and 5) working in the mine is a dirty job – we \ndid not know any better. Themes from the union compensation representatives and physicians \nincluded: 1) additional support resources required, 2) smoking cessation is essential, 3) the \ncompensation claim process is challenging, 4) occupational diseases are challenging to prove, and \n5) occupational COPD is costly. These results suggested that advocacy is critical to ensuring \nunderground workers receive the support they need to obtain approval of a compensation claim. \nThe results also illustrated the need for further education about the ability to document and support \nan occupational illness for physicians and worker’s compensation caseworkers involved in caring \nfor an underground mineral worker diagnosed with occupational COPD. Continued research about \noccupational diseases and the compensation claim process for those with COPD is required to \naddress the barriers and challenges experienced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".