Clock on the Tower of the Council House in Braşov: Pages of history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People have always been fascinated by time, and for its measurement natural rhythms (cycle of seasons, movement of stars) were first used, and then various devices with which help they organized their economic, social and religious life. In the Middle Ages the towers of the cathedrals and city halls were equipped with intricate mechanisms that could measure day and night, but not without errors for a 24-hour period. City clocks meant a lot in the life of society, becoming the subject of local mythology, and the buildings on which they were located became emblematic monuments. The clock installed on the tower of the Braşov Council House in the early 16th century was equipped with four dials located on the four sides of the tower. The bell had been setting in motion with the help of a wooden figurine. In the 18th century there was installed a bell sounding every quarter of an hour. In 1877, the city council acquired the mechanism produced at the Johann Mannhardt’s factory in Munich, which functioned until 2010, and then was replaced by another one, manufactured in 1890 by the same manufacturer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".