CULTURES AND TO KNOW YOUTHFUL: A CHALLENGE CONTEMPORARY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article deals with the relation between youthful cultures, groups and schools, having as reference research developed in the period of October of 2002 the September of 2003, in two scenes: the first one, a municipal public school of the city of Belo Horizonte, called Sdna School here; as, the Group of Capoeira M.B, created and co-ordinated for a young living capoeirista of the quarter where the school if locates. The objective was to observe, to describe and to interpret experiences of young students in the two scenes and, thus, to understand the diverse cultural expressions gifts in the daily pertaining to school and the ways as the School, through its educators and of its politician-pedagogical projects, with them if they relate. The proposal metodolgica adopted was of the Study of Case the description-antropolgico, of etnogrfica boarding, in the perspective of Cultural History or historical Anthropology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.123 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".