MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036790996

Constructing the New Urban Environment: Challenging the Idea of Adaptive Reuse

2019· article· en· W7036790996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReuseAdaptive reuseContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Set (abstract data type)Key (lock)Urban design
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Adaptive reuse is concerned with how an architectural site creates a direct connection with not only what is
\npresent, but also to what was in the past. It is a concept that is integrated in the interior design process and involves
\nrevealing the hidden spirit of a place through the existing context (Brooker and Stone 2018). This paper challenges
\nthe idea of adaptive reuse by exploring the impact and benefit of new-builds in the urban environment, specifically
\nin the context of Western culture and civilization. Designers are often tasked to practice with existing parameters
\nsuch as an enclosed room and maintaining building integrity. In working with these set parameters and the
\ninvolvement of adaptive reuse, it allows for consideration for the site, contextual values, and sustainability.
\nHowever, new construction is inevitable in the urban environment."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.139
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it