Creating life albums with personal care home residents who have dementia : assessing the impact on selected family visit interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this research was to develop life albums for personal care home residents with dementia and to evaluate their use by family visitors.Life albums were created for 6 residents and their families, guided by the concepts of reminiscence and life story work.The research was guided by a theoretical perspective of social exchange.Findings showed that the life albums provided a focal point of interaction between residents and family visitors and confirmed that persons with dementia have stories they can share which are valued by family members.In addition, the involvement and benefits to visitors varied, depending on their family relationship with the resident.In the future, research aimed at understanding the different experiences of spouses and offspring in creating and using life albums would be beneficial.Appendix I Sample Log Book Sheet .............-....146 areas of "reminiscence" and "life review" by extending these concepts to include residents with dementia.This study assesses perspectives of family visitors on the effects of creating a collaborative life story documented into a picture book called the life album.In-depth interviews were conducted to understand what the visiting experience was like with and without the life album.Visitor perspectives of how the album may have contributed to the abilities of residents with dementia to communicate with visitors and to improve the quality of visits were analyzed.There had been little previous research on combining different types of life story work with persons who have dementia.This study explored the life album's use as a tool in restoring a balanced social exchange in day-to-day visits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".