MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036853457

The decline of the Greenland White-fronted Goose: diagnosing causes, identifying solutions

2023· dissertation· en· W7036853457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Research Exeter (University of Exeter) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetapopulationPopulationPopulation declineReproductive successNettingCullingCircumpolar star
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Understanding the decline of migratory birds is complex owing to the vast journeys they undertake annually. Individuals use multiple sites across the annual cycle, each associated with its own threats, and any single site can contribute to population decline. A holistic approach is required to understand population decline, investigating each stage of the annual cycle to identify potential causes. The Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris (GWfG) is a long-distance migrant that has undergone a stark population decline since 1999. The population exhibits a metapopulation structure and the two largest sub-populations (Islay, Scotland and Wexford, Ireland) overwhelming contribute to the overall trends of the metapopulation and are the focus of this thesis. Approaches I reviewed spatial changes in avian migrations, particularly the causes and consequences of distributional shifts. The emphasis was on the inter-connected nature of migratory stages and how changes at one stage can have implications that cascade throughout the annual cycle. I then explored two key potential drivers of GWfG population decline; 1) drivers of low reproductive success, particular in the Wexford sub-population and, 2) non-breeding ground factors that could reduce the fitness of the Islay sub-population. To understand drivers of reproductive success I developed a method to identify incubation from biologging data and then applied it to GWfG to determine the drivers of reproductive success. This was complemented with a population-level analysis, investigating how broad-scale climatic factors influence reproductive output of both sub-populations. On Islay, the sympatric Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis are managed to reduce the population size and I explored how shooting-related disturbance and environmental lead (Pb) from spent shot might have negative fitness implications for GWfG. We used biologging to examine how shooting impacted the movement, habitat selection and behaviour of both goose species. A variety of methods were used to quantify Pb ingestion levels including faecal sampling, x-rays and post mortems. Key findings The decline of GWfG has coincided with a weakening of the relationship between climatic factors on the breeding grounds and reproductive success. There has also been a significant decline in reproductive success for the Wexford sub-population but not the Islay sub-population. Using my methodology to classify incubations I found that the nest survival of the Wexford sub-population is lower and driven by different environmental and phenological factors compared to the Islay sub-population. On the Islay non-breeding grounds we found GWfG were infrequently disturbed by shooting and their response differed significantly compared to Barnacle Geese. GWfG showed little to no changes in daily energetic expenditure, habitat selection or behaviour in response to shooting. All methods used to quantify lead ingestion suggested that levels were low across both species and therefore it was unlikely to cause reduced survival/fitness in either species. Implications The review highlights the interconnected nature of migrations and that incorporating this into the modelling of climate-change driven range shifts could improve the accuracy of future predictions. There appear to be different drivers of reproductive output in the two main GWfG sub-populations. This will likely require bespoke conservation strategies targeted at the sub-population level to reverse declines. For the Wexford sub-population the most likely causes of low reproductive success are carry-over effects causing poor breeding condition, increases in predation or competition with the expanding Canada Geese Branta Canadensis interior population in western Greenland. For the Islay sub-population, changes in other demographic rates, e.g. survival and emigration, are likely implicated in declines and warrant further research. On the non-breeding grounds hunting of Islay Barnacle Geese does not appear to be having negative fitness impacts on the GWfG. The measures to minimise the effects of Barnacle Geese management on GWfG, appear to have been largely successful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it