MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036900429

Design of a broadband PLL solution for burst-mode Clock and Data Recovery in all-optical networks

2005· dissertation· en· W7036900429 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Analysis and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandData recoveryBroadband networksPhase-locked loopClock recoveryComponent (thermodynamics)Application-specific integrated circuit
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All-Optical networks have been proposed as a solution to meet growing demand for broadband access. An essential component in these networks will be new Clock and Data Recovery devices which can recover burst-mode traffic. This a significantly different challenge from conventional, continuous-mode CDR. Burst-mode data originates at various sources and arrives at the receiver with different phases, potentially changing by +/-pi Rads. Therefore, new CDR designs are required to adapt to large steps in phase upon each new burst to maintain BER integrity. This must be accomplished on the order of ns if All-Optical networks are to be viable. While several such designs have been proposed, a clear solution has yet to emerge. This thesis proposes broadband PLLs as a new solution for burst-mode Clock and Data Recovery. The design of a completed broadband Phase-locked CDR ASIC is presented, from original device modeling to implementation and testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicLiterary Analysis and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207