MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036918862

Decoding Gen Z Identity Construction in Social Networks Through The Paradigm of Branding

2020· other· en· W7036918862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)IdeologyCitizen journalismExpression (computer science)Resource (disambiguation)Social identity theoryAssociation (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social networks play a significant and often monopolizing role in the lives of youth and provide spaces where they can express their individual identity and experiment with who they are and what they represent. This paper examines the evolution of social networks from play spaces to marketplaces; where self-expression is more about impressions, and the nature of self-identity fuses with the principles of branding. By examining the complex association between identity expression and branding within public and participatory networked ecosystems, this study scrutinizes the way children build ideologies of their own selves. The study culminates with a toolkit as a resource for parents and carers—applying the principles of brand strategy to help carers play a more meaningful role in constructing, nurturing, and protecting youth identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it