MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036927740

Correlating Neuropsychiatric Symptoms with Regional Beta-Amyloid Load in the Alzheimerâs Disease Brain Using [11C]SB-13 Positron Emission Tomography

2010· dissertation· en· W7036927740 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporal lobePositron emission tomographyDorsolateral prefrontal cortexNeuroimagingCorrelationDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseAutopsyCerebellum
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correlations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and beta-amyloid (Aβ) burden in specific brain regions in living Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients remain to be elucidated. Ten mild AD patients underwent MR and [11C]SB-13 PET imaging. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were quantified with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). NPI-depression/dysphoria, -apathy, -agitation/aggression, -anxiety, and -appetite/eating disorders scores were hypothesized to correlate with Aβ burden in particular brain regions. Pearson’s correlation coefficient revealed that depression/dysphoria scores positively correlated (p<0.05) with standardized uptake values (SUVs) from left medial temporal lobe (r=0.67), and agitation/aggression correlated with SUVs from bilateral anterior cingulate (right, r=0.71; left, r=0.78), temporal (right, r=0.71; left, r=0.75), parietal (right, r=0.77; left, r=0.81), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right, r=0.74; left, r=0.73). However, NPI scores did not significantly correlate with better estimates of Aβ burden that use the cerebellum as reference region. Overall, our results confirm the lack of association between Aβ burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms reported in autopsy studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicBody Contouring and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207