MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7036944549

COVID-19, Human Rights and Public Health in Prisons: A Case Study of Nova Scotia’s Experience During the First Wave of the Pandemic

2021· article· en· W7036944549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPublic healthHuman rightsPandemicPrisonEconomic JusticeCriminal justiceCriminal offence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of preventing outbreaks in prisons during a pandemic, such as COVID-19, cannot be overstated. The risk of the infection spreading rapidly once inside these institutions is much higher than in the community, due to the underlying vulnerabilities of prison populations and the congregated living nature of prisons. This article documents the Nova Scotia provincial prison system’s experience in dealing with COVID-19 during the first wave, including its uniquely swift decarceration efforts. One goal of this investigation is to identify a set of best practices that can help Canadian prisons systems with their short-term responses to crisis in a manner that is compliant with both international and national public health policies and human rights. Another goal of this investigation, based on the systemic weaknesses highlighted by the pandemic, is to advance longerterm recommendations that would improve the criminal justice system and help maintain lower levels of incarceration. On ne saurait trop insister sur l’importance de la prévention des épidémies dans les prisons lors d’une pandémie telle que celle de la COVID-19. Le risque que l’infection se propage rapidement une fois à l’intérieur de ces institutions est beaucoup plus élevé que dans la collectivité, en raison des vulnérabilités sousjacentes des populations carcérales et de la nature de la vie en prison. Dans cet article, nous faisons état de l’expérience vécue dans le système pénitentiaire provincial de la Nouvelle-Écosse face à la COVID-19 lors de la première vague, y compris les efforts déployés en vue d’une mise en liberté plus rapide. L’un des objectifs de cette enquête est d’identifier un ensemble de bonnes pratiques qui peuvent aider les systèmes pénitentiaires canadiens à réagir à court terme à la crise d’une manière qui soit conforme aux politiques de santé publique nationales et internationales ainsi qu’au respect des droits de la personne. Un autre objectif de cette enquête, basé sur les faiblesses systémiques mises en évidence par la pandémie, est de proposer des recommandations à plus long terme qui amélioreraient le système de justice pénale et contribueraient à maintenir des niveaux d’incarcération plus bas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→