MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036993287

Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 50:1 (2014)- Whole Issue

2014· article· en· W7036993287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Resource (disambiguation)MEDLINE
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ARTICLES 4 National Consortium on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts Celebrates 25 Years. 6 The Third Branch of the Third Sovereign: A Brief History of Tribal Courts and Their Perception in the Supreme Court. 14 Knowing the Communities We Serve. 24 The Supreme Court’s Emerging Jurisprudence on the Punishment of Juveniles: Legal and Policy Implications. 40 Achieving Racial and Ethnic Fairness in Drug Courts. 48 The Court’s Brain: Neuroscience and Judicial Decision Making in Criminal Sentencing. 64 Addressing Implicit Bias in the Courts. DEPARTMENTS 2 Editor’s Note. 3 President’s Column. 72 The Resource Page.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0170.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0190.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207