Decolonizando el currículo. Una experiencia con cursos de lectura y escritura académicas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo presenta algunos de los resultados de un proyecto aplicado a los cursos nivelatorios de lectoescritura de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá, durante los periodos académicos 2012-1 a 2013-1. Analiza el programa syllabus de los cursos con base en la investigación-acción participativa como enfoque metodológico y en los aportes teóricos del giro decolonial, en particular, el concepto de colonialidad del lenguaje. Los resultados revelan que el género argumental era la tipología discursiva primordial en la literacidad académica; se desconocían las prácticas culturales y lingüísticas de los estudiantes y se reproducía una mirada eurocéntrica y colonial. También, identifican una mirada formalista y remedial de la lectoescritura, pues los aspectos sintácticos y gramaticales desplazan elementos funcionales y comunicativos; por lo tanto, fue necesario decolonizar el programa del curso para vincular los saberes y modos de comunicación de los estudiantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".