MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037007104

"Cultivateurs et commerçans": Household production, consumption and the industrious revolution in the duchy of Brabant (1680-1800)

2017· article· en· W7037007104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbateConsumption (sociology)ClothingColonialismQuarter (Canadian coin)Industrial RevolutionAgricultural revolutionAgricultureDuchyProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central to my research is the question whether documented changes in consumption and material culture in the cities of Antwerp and Brussels from the last quarter of the 17th century onwards triggered an industrious revolution in the surrounding countryside. Central to the notion of an industrious revolution are simultaneous changes in household production and consumption, whereby consumer aspirations triggered an intensification of market-oriented labor. A sample of probate inventories is used to analyze household’s decisions and strategies regarding agriculture and cottage industry, as well as changes in the ownership of household goods, clothing and the consumption of colonial groceries. The research revealed a market-oriented intensification of labor, as well as an increase in domestic comfort and in consumption of store-bought textiles and stimulants. Changes in demand, however, better fit the concept of a consumer revolution driven by declining prices whereas the observed industrious behavior was households responding to opportunities created by the growth of urban markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLirias (KU Leuven)Same topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207